Political Ideologies Essay Example
The following sample will show you how to write a good Political Ideologies essay. If you want to order a unique one, Paper Help writers can write an even better one for you.
To what extent should we embrace the ideological perspective(s) reflected in the source?
The prospect of adopting ideological perspectives presented in the sources is subjective. In this regard, it overly depends on which ideology is well suited for contemporary experiences. Therefore, it is ideal to evaluate the ideologies in each source independently.
In the first source, there is the depiction of fire held by a firm hand and a hysterical man attempting to put it out using a ladder supported by the fire stand. The source indicates attempts to stop wide-reaching changes. The dominant ideological perspective demystified is social conservatism in which the strong hand and fire represent the impeding social change while the hysterical individual shows the opposition to changing traditional values. It demystifies contemporary experiences where emerging elements such as technology are taking over practices, including workplaces with the citizens remaining at the mercy of the regimes represented by the hand.
The second source has a vehicle written on “committee on un-American activities” that appears to run over people while the header reads, “it’s okay… we are hunting communists.” The represented ideological perspective is imperialism. In this regard, the committee is focused on achieving its objective even at the expense of people’s life and health. Moreover, it sees its objective of hunting communists as a justification for its inhumane action. The desire to end communism indicates the desire to impart relative power. There is no liberalism as people are not free even to walk on roads.
In source three, there is a conversation between two persons; one seems to be from the west, possibly America, and the other is Russian. The assertion that their task would be easier if there were an external threat to the world, which shows they are humans, indicates their frontline roles in the Cold War between the U.S. and the USSR. They appear to have weapons ready but are unwilling to unleash at each other. Therefore, they depict aspects of humanism. The limitation indicated by the speaker shows low levels of liberalism.
Source four shows soldiers facing each other, attacking themselves with arrows, yet they have bombs. They are instructed not to use bombs as the enemy might retaliate. It is a classic depiction of the Cold War in the 1980s as both the U.S. and USSR had atomic power but used minor infractions to peak at each other. It is a subtle show of imperialism as each nation wants to indirectly exert its relative power on the other. Imperialism often takes the place of liberalism, weakening it.
The fifth source asks where the anger or hate is because both the U.S. and Soviet Union had amassed more brute force for each human being on earth. It is a show of the depth of the Cold War. Instead of preparing for an attack from their possible adversary, the U.S. and USSR readied themselves to face the whole world if it came against them. The conduct could be due to the fear of alliances during physical wars as depicted during WWI and WWII. The source does not reflect imperialism in play. However, it shows the efforts that would ultimately lead to imperial actions as either of the two nations could attempt to take over the other. Focus on subduing each other negates liberal practices, especially by the government.
Source six is a quote from 1953 that questions the humanity of actions focused on war instead of people. The source indicates disappearing humanism among the regimes as they do not focus on people anymore. There is no liberalism as the society appears to have neglected the position of citizens.
The last source has two soldiers fighting with nails, yet they have guns and other weapons. It depicts the Cold War, where each nation does not want to be the first to launch a full-blown attack on the other. Instead, they appear to be measuring each other. It is an act of subtle imperialism. With such engagements, liberalism is rarely encouraged as the focus is on international imperialism.
The ideological perspectives presented in the sources vary. Each source depicts a unique perspective. For instance, in source one, the dominant ideological perspective is conservatism, while in source two, it is imperialism. Therefore, appreciation of ideological perspectives should be based on their impact on the people and the nation. In this regard, positive ideological perspectives such as humanism questioned in source six should be embraced.
Another determinant for embracing the ideological perspectives should be based on their promotion of liberalism. Ideally, both social and economic liberalism are vital for a progressive society. Most of the depicted perspectives promote imperialism as they center on the Cold War. In this regard, both the U.S. and the Soviet Union wanted to impart their ideology on the other as well as the surrounding nations. Therefore, the ideological perspectives are not overly suitable for worldwide adoption.